Mark Howlett v. Scott Rose
496 U.S. 356 · Decided June 11, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Mark Howlett v. Scott Rose was decided on June 11, 1990 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, miscellaneous” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 496 U.S. 356 · 110 S. Ct. 2430 · 110 L. Ed. 2d 332 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3077
- Docket number
- 89-5383
- Decided
- June 11, 1990
- Argued
- March 20, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- National supremacy, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Mark Howlett, a Minor, by and Through Elizabeth Howlett, His Mother, Natural Guardian and Next Friend v. Scott Rose, as Superintendent of Schools for Pinellas County, Florida, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-106, docket 1989-106-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “National supremacy, miscellaneous”
- George S. Bennett v. ArkansasLaw held unconstitutional
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Rose v. Arkansas State PoliceLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Alfonso Lopez, Jr.Law held unconstitutional
- Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
- Lawrence County v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Rose v. Rose
- Reynoldsville Casket Co. v. Carol L. Hyde
- Washington v. United States
- Toll v. Moreno
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Tafflin v. Levitt
- Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. Barrett
- Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly
- United Steelworkers of America v. Rawson
- North Dakota v. United States
- California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error