CaseTrail

Mark Howlett v. Scott Rose

496 U.S. 356 · Decided June 11, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Mark Howlett v. Scott Rose was decided on June 11, 1990 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, miscellaneous” in the Federalism area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
496 U.S. 356 · 110 S. Ct. 2430 · 110 L. Ed. 2d 332 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3077
Docket number
89-5383
Decided
June 11, 1990
Argued
March 20, 1990
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Federalism
Legal provision
Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Mark Howlett, a Minor, by and Through Elizabeth Howlett, His Mother, Natural Guardian and Next Friend v. Scott Rose, as Superintendent of Schools for Pinellas County, Florida, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1989-106, docket 1989-106-01.

Other cases on “National supremacy, miscellaneous”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)

Same Term, same area (Federalism)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error