Margaret Kawaauhau v. Paul W. Geiger
523 U.S. 57 · Decided March 3, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Margaret Kawaauhau v. Paul W. Geiger was decided on March 3, 1998 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Bankruptcy” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 523 U.S. 57 · 118 S. Ct. 974 · 140 L. Ed. 2d 90 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 1595
- Docket number
- 97-115
- Decided
- March 3, 1998
- Argued
- January 21, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Bankruptcy
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Bankruptcy Code or Bankruptcy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Margaret Kawaauhau, et Vir v. Paul W. Geiger
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-035, docket 1997-035-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Bankruptcy”
- Edward S. Cohen v. Hilda de La Cruz
- Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Richard V Fink
- Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash et Ux.
- Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association v. 203 North Lasalle Street Partnership
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.
- Thomas E. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of Revenue
Cases on the same legal provision: Bankruptcy Code or Bankruptcy Act
- United States v. Thomas R. Noland
- John M. Lamie v. United States Trustee
- Jeanne Farrey v. Gerald J. Sanderfoot
- Harry P. Begier, Jr., Etc. v. Internal Revenue Service
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- State Oil Company v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan & Associates, Inc.Altered precedent
- Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corporation of California, Inc.
- Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Richard V Fink
- Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals TribunalLaw held unconstitutional
- Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
- National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error