Lustig v. United States
338 U.S. 74 · Decided June 27, 1949 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Lustig v. United States was decided on June 27, 1949 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the opinion announcing the judgment of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 338 U.S. 74 · 69 S. Ct. 1372 · 93 L. Ed. 2d 1819 · 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2083
- Docket number
- 1389
- Decided
- June 27, 1949
- Argued
- April 19, 1948
- Reargued
- October 19, 1948
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Felix Frankfurter
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Exclusionary rule (Fourth Amendment)
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Judgment of the Court | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Concurrence | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Dissent | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Concurrence | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Dissent |
Full case caption
Lustig v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1948-118, docket 1948-118-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- Wolf v. Colorado
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.
- McDonald v. United States
- District of Columbia v. Little
- United States v. RabinowitzAltered precedent
- Trupiano v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Exclusionary rule (Fourth Amendment)
- Schwartz v. Texas
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania
- Linkletter v. Walker
- Angelet v. Fay
- California v. Hurst.
- Brown v. Illinois
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Upshaw v. United States
- Uveges v. Pennsylvania
- McDonald v. United States
- Michelson v. United States
- Frazier v. United States
- Fisher v. Pace
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error