Angelet v. Fay
381 U.S. 654 · Decided June 7, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Angelet v. Fay was decided on June 7, 1965 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Retroactivity of new rights” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 381 U.S. 654 · 85 S. Ct. 1750 · 14 L. Ed. 2d 623 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 974
- Docket number
- 578
- Decided
- June 7, 1965
- Argued
- March 11, 1965
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Retroactivity of new rights
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Exclusionary rule (Fourth Amendment)
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Angelet v. Fay, Warden
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-124, docket 1964-124-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Retroactivity of new rights”
- Linkletter v. Walker
- California v. Hurst.
- Tehan v. United States ex Rel. Shott
- Johnson v. New Jersey
- New Jersey v. Russo
- Roberts v. Russell
Cases on the same legal provision: Exclusionary rule (Fourth Amendment)
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania
- Black v. United States
- United States v. Calandra
- Brown v. Illinois
- United States v. Janis
- Walder v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Boles v. Stevenson
- Beck v. Ohio
- Turner v. Louisiana
- Stanford v. TexasLaw held unconstitutional
- Singer v. United States
- United States v. Gainey
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error