Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
432 U.S. 333 · Decided June 20, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission was decided on June 20, 1977 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 432 U.S. 333 · 97 S. Ct. 2434 · 53 L. Ed. 2d 383 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 123
- Docket number
- 76-63
- Decided
- June 20, 1977
- Argued
- February 22, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-149, docket 1976-149-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- United States Trust Company of New York v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
- Raymond Motor Transportation, Inc. v. RiceLaw held unconstitutional
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland
- City of New Orleans v. DukesAltered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradyAltered precedent
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Department of Revenue of Washington v. Association of Washington Stevedoring CompaniesAltered precedent
- National League of Cities v. UseryAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Hughes v. OklahomaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
- United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enterprises, Inc.
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train
- City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error