Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.
426 U.S. 794 · Decided June 24, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp. was decided on June 24, 1976 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 426 U.S. 794 · 96 S. Ct. 2488 · 49 L. Ed. 2d 220 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 136
- Docket number
- 74-1607
- Decided
- June 24, 1976
- Argued
- January 21, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Hughes, Secretary of Transportation of Maryland, et al. v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-142, docket 1975-142-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- City of New Orleans v. DukesAltered precedent
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell
- United States Trust Company of New York v. New JerseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Southern Overlying Carrier Chapter of the California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Carter v. MillerLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- National League of Cities v. UseryAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradyAltered precedent
- National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization
- Fry v. United States
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Brada Miller Freight Systems, Inc.
- American Foreign Steamship Co. v. Matise
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesAltered precedent
- United States v. Bornstein
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error