Heckler v. Mathews
465 U.S. 728 · Decided March 5, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Heckler v. Mathews was decided on March 5, 1984 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 465 U.S. 728 · 104 S. Ct. 1387 · 79 L. Ed. 2d 646 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 38
- Docket number
- 82-1050
- Decided
- March 5, 1984
- Argued
- December 5, 1983
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Social Security Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Mathews et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-049, docket 1983-049-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Grove City College v. Bell
- Lehr v. Robertson
- Mississippi University for Women v. HoganLaw held unconstitutional
- Rostker v. Goldberg
- Kirchberg v. FeenstraLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County (California
Cases on the same legal provision: Social Security Act
- Heckler v. Campbell
- Bowen v. Owens
- Bowen v. City of New York
- Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment
- Bowen v. Yuckert
- Schweiker v. Chilicky
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education
- United Building & Construction Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor and Council of the City of Camden
- McCain v. Lybrand
- Solem v. Bartlett
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error