CaseTrail

Hazen Paper Company v. Walter F. Biggins

507 U.S. 604 · Decided April 20, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Hazen Paper Company v. Walter F. Biggins was decided on April 20, 1993 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
507 U.S. 604 · 113 S. Ct. 1701 · 123 L. Ed. 2d 338 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 2978
Docket number
91-1600
Decided
April 20, 1993
Argued
January 13, 1993
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Hazen Paper Company, et al. v. Walter F. Biggins

SCDB identifiers: case 1992-056, docket 1992-056-01.

Other cases on “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Age Discrimination in Employment Act

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error