Hazen Paper Company v. Walter F. Biggins
507 U.S. 604 · Decided April 20, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Hazen Paper Company v. Walter F. Biggins was decided on April 20, 1993 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 507 U.S. 604 · 113 S. Ct. 1701 · 123 L. Ed. 2d 338 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 2978
- Docket number
- 91-1600
- Decided
- April 20, 1993
- Argued
- January 13, 1993
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Concurrence | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence |
Full case caption
Hazen Paper Company, et al. v. Walter F. Biggins
SCDB identifiers: case 1992-056, docket 1992-056-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employment discrimination (race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, working conditions)”
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. Melvin Hicks
- Barbara Landgraf v. Usi Film Products
- Maurice Rivers and Robert C. Davison v. Roadway Express, Inc.
- Gary M. McKnight v. General Motors Corporation
- Ellis Gregory, Jr. and Anthony P. Nugent, Jr. v. John D. Ashcroft
- Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Angelo J. Solimino
Cases on the same legal provision: Age Discrimination in Employment Act
- Christine McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
- Robert D. Gilmer v. Interstate/johnson Lane Corporation
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Richard Sperling
- J. Daniel Kimel, Jr. v. Florida Board of RegentsLaw held unconstitutional
- Lehman v. Nakshian
- Lorillard v. Pons
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- James L. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- James Rowland v. California Men's Colony
- Jayne Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic
- Emery L. Negonsott v. Harold Samuels
- George Voinovich v. Barney Quilter
- Charlene Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error