CaseTrail

Glen Whorton v. Marvin Howard Bockting

549 U.S. 406 · Decided February 28, 2007 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Glen Whorton v. Marvin Howard Bockting was decided on February 28, 2007 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Retroactivity of new rights” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
549 U.S. 406 · 127 S. Ct. 1173 · 167 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 2007 U.S. LEXIS 2826
Docket number
05-595
Decided
February 28, 2007
Argued
November 1, 2006
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Retroactive application of a constitutional right
Type of law
Other
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Glen Whorton, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections v. Marvin Howard Bockting

SCDB identifiers: case 2006-020, docket 2006-020-01.

Other cases on “Retroactivity of new rights”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Retroactive application of a constitutional right

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error