Floyd J. Carter v. United States
530 U.S. 255 · Decided June 12, 2000 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Floyd J. Carter v. United States was decided on June 12, 2000 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Statutory construction of criminal laws, bank robbery” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 530 U.S. 255 · 120 S. Ct. 2159 · 147 L. Ed. 2d 203 · 2000 U.S. LEXIS 3963
- Docket number
- 99-5716
- Decided
- June 12, 2000
- Argued
- April 19, 2000
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 18 U.S.C. § 2113
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent |
Full case caption
Floyd J. Carter v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1999-076, docket 1999-076-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Statutory construction of criminal laws, bank robbery”
- Edmund Boyle v. United States
- Marvin Peugh v. United States
- McLaughlin v. United States
- Whitfield v. United States
- Simpson v. United States
- United States v. Gaddis
Cases on the same legal provision: 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- James Michael Flippo v. West Virginia
- New York v. Michael Hill
- Illinois v. William aka Sam Wardlow
- Salvador Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
- Lonnie Weeks, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone
- United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error