Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.
515 U.S. 618 · Decided June 21, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc. was decided on June 21, 1995 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 515 U.S. 618 · 115 S. Ct. 2371 · 132 L. Ed. 2d 541 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 4250
- Docket number
- 94-226
- Decided
- June 21, 1995
- Argued
- January 11, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, attorneys
- Issue area
- Attorneys
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc., and John T. Blakely
SCDB identifiers: case 1994-086, docket 1994-086-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”
- Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation
- Gary E. Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar AssociationLaw held unconstitutional
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioLaw held unconstitutional
- In re R. M. J.Law held unconstitutional
- Milavetz v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- John J. Hurley and South Boston Allied War Veterans Council v. Irish-American GayLaw held unconstitutional
- Joseph McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. National Treasury Employees UnionLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael A. Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. and Peoples Super Liquor Stores, Inc. v. Rhode Island and Rhode Island Liquor Stores AssociationAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Judy Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error