Fisher v. City of Berkeley
475 U.S. 260 · Decided February 26, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Fisher v. City of Berkeley was decided on February 26, 1986 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 475 U.S. 260 · 106 S. Ct. 1045 · 89 L. Ed. 2d 206 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 12
- Docket number
- 84-1538
- Decided
- February 26, 1986
- Argued
- November 12, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Fisher et al. v. City of Berkeley, California, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-044, docket 1985-044-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD v. Zenith Radio Corp.
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of Dentists
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
- Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.
- 324 Liquor Corp. v. Duffy
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
- Cleavinger v. Saxner
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD v. Zenith Radio Corp.
- Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Panduit Corp.
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error