Federal Power Commission v. Oregon
349 U.S. 435 · Decided June 6, 1955 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Oregon was decided on June 6, 1955 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 349 U.S. 435 · 75 S. Ct. 832 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 1215 · 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1399
- Docket number
- 367
- Decided
- June 6, 1955
- Argued
- March 2, 1955
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority |
Did not participate: John M. Harlan II.
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Oregon et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1954-094, docket 1954-094-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- United States v. Howard
- United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
- United States ex Rel. Chapman v. Federal Power Commission
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.
- Organized Village of Kake v. Egan
- Dugan v. Rank
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
- United States v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- McAllister v. United States
- Watson et Ux. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd.
- Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.
- Cox v. Roth
- United States v. Shubert
- United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error