Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
347 U.S. 239 · Decided March 15, 1954 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. was decided on March 15, 1954 by a vote of 4–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 347 U.S. 239 · 74 S. Ct. 487 · 98 L. Ed. 2d 666 · 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2621
- Docket number
- 28
- Decided
- March 15, 1954
- Argued
- October 15, 1953
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 4–3
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority |
Did not participate: Stanley F. Reed, Robert H. Jackson.
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
SCDB identifiers: case 1953-052, docket 1953-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.
- Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro
- Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
- Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Union Electric Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- United States v. Public Utilities Commission of California
- Federal Power Commission v. Oregon
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma
- Udall v. Federal Power Commission
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Voris v. Eikel
- Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc.
- Avondale Marine Ways, Inc. v. Henderson
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn
- Wilko v. Swan
- General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error