Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown
431 U.S. 99 · Decided May 2, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown was decided on May 2, 1977 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mootness” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 431 U.S. 99 · 97 S. Ct. 1635 · 52 L. Ed. 2d 166 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 15
- Docket number
- 75-909
- Decided
- May 2, 1977
- Argued
- January 12, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mootness
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown, Governor of California, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-097, docket 1976-097-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mootness”
- Kremens v. Bartley
- Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board
- Vitek v. Jones
- Weinstein v. Bradford
- Preiser v. Newkirk
- Edwards v. Healy
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Ashcroft v. Mattis
- Singleton v. Wulff
- New Hampshire v. Maine
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
- Hicklin v. OrbeckLaw held unconstitutional
- County of Los Angeles v. Davis
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesAltered precedent
- Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board
- Massachusetts v. Feeney
- Tully v. Griffin, Inc.
- Belcher v. Stengel
- Cook v. Hudson
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error