Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
340 U.S. 558 · Decided February 26, 1951 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp. was decided on February 26, 1951 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 340 U.S. 558 · 71 S. Ct. 408 · 95 L. Ed. 2d 534 · 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2475
- Docket number
- 209
- Decided
- February 26, 1951
- Argued
- January 3, 1951
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Sherman Minton.
Full case caption
Emich Motors Corp. et al. v. General Motors Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1950-046, docket 1950-046-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.
- Schwegmann Brothers v. Calvert Distillers Corp.
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
- Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
- United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Fogarty v. United States
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States
- Libby v. United States
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
- Feres v. United States
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error