CaseTrail

Eloise Anderson v. Deshawn Green

513 U.S. 557 · Decided February 22, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Eloise Anderson v. Deshawn Green was decided on February 22, 1995 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, justiciable question” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
513 U.S. 557 · 115 S. Ct. 1059 · 130 L. Ed. 2d 1050 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 1625
Docket number
94-197
Decided
February 22, 1995
Argued
January 17, 1995
Decision type
Per curiam (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Eloise Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, et al. v. Deshawn Green, Debby Venturella and Diana P. Bertollt, Etc.

SCDB identifiers: case 1994-027, docket 1994-027-01.

Other cases on “Standing, justiciable question”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error