Arthur Calderon v. Troy Ashmus, Etc.
523 U.S. 740 · Decided May 26, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Arthur Calderon v. Troy Ashmus, Etc. was decided on May 26, 1998 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, justiciable question” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 523 U.S. 740 · 118 S. Ct. 1694 · 140 L. Ed. 2d 970 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 3407
- Docket number
- 97-391
- Decided
- May 26, 1998
- Argued
- March 24, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, justiciable question
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Concurrence | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Arthur Calderon, Warden, et al. v. Troy Ashmus, Etc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-068, docket 1997-068-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, justiciable question”
- Ohio Forestry Association, Inc. v. Sierra Club
- Eloise Anderson v. Deshawn Green
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior
- Walter L. Nixon v. United States
- Richard Vieth v. Robert C. Jubelirer
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Betty Dukes
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Terry Campbell v. Louisiana
- Texas v. United States
- Steel Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment
- Randy G. Spencer v. Mike Kemna
- The Federal Republic of Germany v. United States
- Frederick D. Raines v. Robert C. Byrd
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Melvin Jefferson v. City of Tarrant
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons
- George G. Rogers v. United States
- Regions Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala
- Mary Anna Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error