Dibella v. United States
369 U.S. 121 · Decided March 19, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Dibella v. United States was decided on March 19, 1962 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 369 U.S. 121 · 82 S. Ct. 654 · 7 L. Ed. 2d 614 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2331
- Docket number
- 21
- Decided
- March 19, 1962
- Argued
- January 16, 1962
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Felix Frankfurter
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Special concurrence | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence |
Did not participate: Charles E. Whittaker.
Full case caption
Dibella v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1961-046, docket 1961-046-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Hill v. United States
- Lott v. United States
- Green v. United States
- Andrews v. United States
- Panico v. United States
- Bartone v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Cleary v. Bolger
- Hardy v. United States
- Jones v. United States
- Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States
- Giordenello v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Hamilton v. Alabama
- Hodges v. United States
- Hill v. United States
- Mitchell v. United States
- Chewning v. Cunningham
- Machibroda v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error