Davis v. Mabry
380 U.S. 251 · Decided March 8, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Davis v. Mabry was decided on March 8, 1965 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Voting” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 380 U.S. 251 · 85 S. Ct. 936 · 13 L. Ed. 2d 818 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1671
- Docket number
- 774
- Decided
- March 8, 1965
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Voting
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Davis, Assessor-Collector of Taxes, Bexar County, Texas, et al. v. Mabry et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-061, docket 1964-061-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Voting”
- Louisiana v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Mississippi
- Carrington v. RashLaw held unconstitutional
- Harman v. ForsseniusLaw held unconstitutional
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Anderson v. MartinLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Scranton v. Drew
- McLaughlin v. FloridaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Hamm v. City of Rock Hill
- Parsons v. Buckley
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error