Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb
414 U.S. 441 · Decided January 9, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb was decided on January 9, 1974 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Loyalty oath, political party” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 414 U.S. 441 · 94 S. Ct. 656 · 38 L. Ed. 2d 635 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 147
- Docket number
- 72-1040
- Decided
- January 9, 1974
- Argued
- October 16, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Loyalty oath, political party
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Special concurrence |
Full case caption
Communist Party of Indiana et al. v. Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1973-033, docket 1973-033-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Loyalty oath, political party”
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansLaw held unconstitutional
- Hess v. Indiana
- Norwell v. City of Cincinnati
- Plummer v. City of ColumbusLaw held unconstitutional
- Procunier v. MartinezLaw held unconstitutional
- Pell v. Procunier
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Plummer v. City of ColumbusLaw held unconstitutional
- Norwell v. City of Cincinnati
- Musser v. United States
- Hess v. Indiana
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansLaw held unconstitutional
- Smith v. GoguenLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error