CaseTrail

City of Los Angeles v. Patel

576 U.S. 409 · Decided June 22, 2015 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

City of Los Angeles v. Patel was decided on June 22, 2015 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
576 U.S. 409 · 135 S. Ct. 2443 · 192 L. Ed. 2d 435 · 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4065
Docket number
13-1175
Decided
June 22, 2015
Argued
March 3, 2015
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Sonia Sotomayor
Opinion assigned by
Anthony M. Kennedy
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourth Amendment
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

City of Los Angeles, California v. Patel

SCDB identifiers: case 2014-050, docket 2014-050-01.

Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error