CaseTrail

Cammer v. United States

350 U.S. 399 · Decided March 12, 1956 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Cammer v. United States was decided on March 12, 1956 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Contempt of court or Congress” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
350 U.S. 399 · 76 S. Ct. 456 · 100 L. Ed. 2d 474 · 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1737
Docket number
110
Decided
March 12, 1956
Argued
January 24, 1956
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Hugo L. Black
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
18 U.S.C. § 401
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Stanley F. ReedSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajority
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajority
Justice Sherman MintonMajority
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajority

Did not participate: John M. Harlan II.

Full case caption

Cammer v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 1955-037, docket 1955-037-01.

Other cases on “Contempt of court or Congress”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 18 U.S.C. § 401

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error