CaseTrail

Rex Trailer Co., Inc. v. United States

350 U.S. 148 · Decided January 9, 1956 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Rex Trailer Co., Inc. v. United States was decided on January 9, 1956 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
350 U.S. 148 · 76 S. Ct. 219 · 100 L. Ed. 2d 149 · 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1638
Docket number
46
Decided
January 9, 1956
Argued
December 5, 1955
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Tom C. Clark
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
50 U.S.C. § 1635
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackMajority
Justice Stanley F. ReedMajority
Justice Felix FrankfurterSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Sherman MintonMajority
Chief Justice Earl WarrenMajority
Justice John M. Harlan IIMajority

Full case caption

Rex Trailer Co., Inc. v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 1955-016, docket 1955-016-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error