California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
445 U.S. 97 · Decided March 3, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. was decided on March 3, 1980 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 445 U.S. 97 · 100 S. Ct. 937 · 63 L. Ed. 2d 233 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 86
- Docket number
- 79-97
- Decided
- March 3, 1980
- Argued
- January 16, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..
Full case caption
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1979-047, docket 1979-047-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.
- Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc.
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
- Group Life & Health Insurance Co. v. Royal Drug Co., Inc.
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co., Inc. v. Ford
- United States v. Kubrick
- Ferri v. Ackerman
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.
- Hatzlachh Supply Co., Inc. v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error