CaseTrail

California Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt

578 U.S. 171 · Decided April 19, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

California Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt was decided on April 19, 2016 by a vote of 6–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Governmental liability” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
578 U.S. 171 · 136 S. Ct. 1277 · 194 L. Ed. 2d 431 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 2796
Docket number
14-1175
Decided
April 19, 2016
Argued
December 7, 2015
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–2
Majority opinion
Stephen G. Breyer
Opinion assigned by
Anthony M. Kennedy
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

California Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt

SCDB identifiers: case 2015-026, docket 2015-026-01.

Other cases on “Governmental liability”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error