CaseTrail

Byron Keith Cooper v. Oklahoma

517 U.S. 348 · Decided April 16, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Byron Keith Cooper v. Oklahoma was decided on April 16, 1996 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, miscellaneous” in the Due Process area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
517 U.S. 348 · 116 S. Ct. 1373 · 134 L. Ed. 2d 498 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 2649
Docket number
95-5207
Decided
April 16, 1996
Argued
January 17, 1996
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
John Paul Stevens
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Byron Keith Cooper v. Oklahoma

SCDB identifiers: case 1995-044, docket 1995-044-01.

Other cases on “Due process, miscellaneous”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error