CaseTrail

Brownell v. Chase National Bank of New York

352 U.S. 36 · Decided November 19, 1956 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Brownell v. Chase National Bank of New York was decided on November 19, 1956 unanimously (7–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, miscellaneous” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
352 U.S. 36 · 77 S. Ct. 116 · 1 L. Ed. 2d 99 · 1956 U.S. LEXIS 173
Docket number
24
Decided
November 19, 1956
Argued
October 16, 1956
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
7–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
William O. Douglas
Opinion assigned by
Earl Warren
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
Res judicata
Type of law
Other
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Tom C. Clark, John M. Harlan II.

Full case caption

Brownell, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Chase National Bank of New York, Trustee, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1956-005, docket 1956-005-01.

Other cases on “Standing, miscellaneous”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Res judicata

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error