Trump v. New York
141 S. Ct. 530 · Decided December 18, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Trump v. New York was decided on December 18, 2020 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, miscellaneous” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2020
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 20-366
Case details
- Citations
- 141 S. Ct. 530 · 208 L. Ed. 2d 365 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 6105
- Docket number
- 20-366
- Decided
- December 18, 2020
- Argued
- November 30, 2020
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority |
Full case caption
Trump v. New York
SCDB identifiers: case 2020-033, docket 2020-033-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, miscellaneous”
- California v. Texas
- United States v. Texas
- Department of Education v. Brown
- Kisela v. Hughes
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates
- Janet Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Carney v. Adams
- Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
- Transunion LLC v. Ramirez
- Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York
- Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Carney v. Adams
- Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
- Carr v. Saul
- BP P.L.C. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
- City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L.P.
- California v. Texas
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error