CaseTrail

Brigham City v. Charles W. Stuart

547 U.S. 398 · Decided May 22, 2006 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Brigham City v. Charles W. Stuart was decided on May 22, 2006 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
547 U.S. 398 · 126 S. Ct. 1943 · 164 L. Ed. 2d 650 · 2006 U.S. LEXIS 4155
Docket number
05-502
Decided
May 22, 2006
Argued
April 24, 2006
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
John G. Roberts Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Fourth Amendment
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Brigham City, Utah v. Charles W. Stuart et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2005-057, docket 2005-057-01.

Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error