Branti v. Finkel
445 U.S. 507 · Decided March 31, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Branti v. Finkel was decided on March 31, 1980 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 445 U.S. 507 · 100 S. Ct. 1287 · 63 L. Ed. 2d 574 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 4
- Docket number
- 78-1654
- Decided
- March 31, 1980
- Argued
- December 4, 1979
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Branti v. Finkel et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1979-064, docket 1979-064-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentLaw held unconstitutional
- Snepp v. United States
- Brown v. Glines
- Secretary of the Navy v. Huff
- Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- Wolston v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
- Herbert v. Lando
- Friedman v. Rogers
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Brown v. Glines
- Secretary of the Navy v. Huff
- Snepp v. United States
- Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentLaw held unconstitutional
- Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan
- Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error