Blom Bank Sal v. Honickman
145 S. Ct. 1612 · Decided June 5, 2025 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Blom Bank Sal v. Honickman was decided on June 5, 2025 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2024
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 23-1259
Case details
- Citations
- 145 S. Ct. 1612 · 221 L. Ed. 2d 850 · 2025 U.S. LEXIS 2197
- Docket number
- 23-1259
- Decided
- June 5, 2025
- Argued
- March 3, 2025
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Blom Bank Sal v. Honickman
SCDB identifiers: case 2024-039, docket 2024-039-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Berk v. Choy
- Dupree v. Younger
- Kemp v. United States
- City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L.P.
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
- Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services
- Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
- United States v. Zubaydah
- Cameron v. Emw Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C.
- Tharpe v. Sellers
- Manrique v. United States
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank
- Bouarfa v. Mayorkas
- Nvidia Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder Ab
- Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services
- Bufkin v. Collins
- Cc/devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error