CaseTrail

B&b Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc.

575 U.S. 138 · Decided March 24, 2015 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

B&b Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc. was decided on March 24, 2015 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Trademarks” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
575 U.S. 138 · 135 S. Ct. 1293 · 191 L. Ed. 2d 222 · 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2119
Docket number
13-352
Decided
March 24, 2015
Argued
December 2, 2014
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Trademarks
Legal provision
Lanham Act
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

B&b Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc.

SCDB identifiers: case 2014-025, docket 2014-025-01.

Other cases on “Trademarks”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error