CaseTrail

Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States

568 U.S. 23 · Decided December 4, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States was decided on December 4, 2012 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
568 U.S. 23 · 133 S. Ct. 511 · 184 L. Ed. 2d 417 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 9409
Docket number
11-597
Decided
December 4, 2012
Argued
October 3, 2012
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Due Process
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Elena Kagan.

Full case caption

Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Petitioner v. United States

SCDB identifiers: case 2012-001, docket 2012-001-01.

Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)

Same Term, same area (Due Process)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error