Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States
568 U.S. 23 · Decided December 4, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States was decided on December 4, 2012 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, takings clause” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 568 U.S. 23 · 133 S. Ct. 511 · 184 L. Ed. 2d 417 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 9409
- Docket number
- 11-597
- Decided
- December 4, 2012
- Argued
- October 3, 2012
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, takings clause
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority |
Did not participate: Elena Kagan.
Full case caption
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Petitioner v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 2012-001, docket 2012-001-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, takings clause”
- Fane Lozman v. the City of Riviera Beach
- Marvin D. Horne v. Department of Agriculture
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.
- Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureLaw held unconstitutional
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (takings clause)
- Agins et Ux. v. City of Tiburon
- Gurley v. Rhoden
- City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.
- United States v. Fuller et Ux.
- United States v. Grand River Dam Authority
- General Box Co. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Fane Lozman v. the City of Riviera Beach
- Marvin D. Horne v. Department of Agriculture
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.
- United States v. WindsorLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error