CaseTrail

Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan

545 U.S. 605 · Decided June 23, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan was decided on June 23, 2005 by a vote of 7–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, appointment of counsel” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
545 U.S. 605 · 125 S. Ct. 2582 · 162 L. Ed. 2d 552 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5012
Docket number
03-10198
Decided
June 23, 2005
Argued
April 25, 2005
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan

SCDB identifiers: case 2004-073, docket 2004-073-01.

Other cases on “Indigents, appointment of counsel”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error