Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan
545 U.S. 605 · Decided June 23, 2005 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan was decided on June 23, 2005 by a vote of 7–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, appointment of counsel” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 545 U.S. 605 · 125 S. Ct. 2582 · 162 L. Ed. 2d 552 · 2005 U.S. LEXIS 5012
- Docket number
- 03-10198
- Decided
- June 23, 2005
- Argued
- April 25, 2005
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, appointment of counsel
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Antonio Dwayne Halbert v. Michigan
SCDB identifiers: case 2004-073, docket 2004-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, appointment of counsel”
- Rothgery v. Gillespie County
- George Smith v. Lee Robbins
- Cory R. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas
- Michael Martel v. Kenneth Clair
- John Marshall v. Otis Lee Rodgers
- Anthony S. Austin v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Jay Shawn Johnson v. California
- Garrison S. Johnson v. California
- Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher v. Lee Bollinger
- Barbara Grutter v. Lee Bollinger
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Altered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael Fitzgerald v. Racing Association of Central Iowa
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Josue Leocal v. John D. Ashcroft
- Keyse G. Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
- A. Neil Clark v. Sergio Suarez Martinez
- Garrison S. Johnson v. California
- Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation v. Michael O. Leavitt
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Mark J. Abrams
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error