CaseTrail

Amoco Production Company v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe

526 U.S. 865 · Decided June 7, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Amoco Production Company v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe was decided on June 7, 1999 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
526 U.S. 865 · 119 S. Ct. 1719 · 144 L. Ed. 2d 22 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4002
Docket number
98-830
Decided
June 7, 1999
Argued
April 19, 1999
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–1
Majority opinion
Anthony M. Kennedy
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
30 U.S.C. § 81
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Stephen G. Breyer.

Full case caption

Amoco Production Company, on Behalf of Itself and the Class It Represents v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1998-067, docket 1998-067-01.

Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”

See all

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error