Allenberg Cotton Co., Inc. v. Pittman
419 U.S. 20 · Decided November 19, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Allenberg Cotton Co., Inc. v. Pittman was decided on November 19, 1974 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, commodities” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 419 U.S. 20 · 95 S. Ct. 260 · 42 L. Ed. 2d 195 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 11
- Docket number
- 73-628
- Decided
- November 19, 1974
- Argued
- October 17, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- National supremacy, commodities
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Allenberg Cotton Co., Inc. v. Pittman
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-004, docket 1974-004-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “National supremacy, commodities”
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for California v. Ammex Warehouse Co. of San Ysidro, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Law held unconstitutional
- North Dakota v. United States
- Public Utilities Commission of California v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- Stephen P. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilLaw held unconstitutional
- Testa v. Katt
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- United States v. Mazurie
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Washington
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle
- Fry v. United States
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- American Radio Assn. v. Mobile Steamship Assn., Inc.
- Cousins v. Wigoda
- Utah v. United States
- United States v. Florida
- United States v. Maine
- United States v. Louisiana
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error