Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United States
336 U.S. 176 · Decided February 14, 1949 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United States was decided on February 14, 1949 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Stanley F. Reed wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal taxation (Internal Revenue Code)” in the Federal Taxation area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 336 U.S. 176 · 69 S. Ct. 492 · 93 L. Ed. 2d 591 · 1949 U.S. LEXIS 2956
- Docket number
- 237
- Decided
- February 14, 1949
- Argued
- January 7, 1949
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stanley F. Reed
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal taxation (Internal Revenue Code)
- Issue area
- Federal Taxation
- Legal provision
- Internal Revenue Code
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1948-036, docket 1948-036-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal taxation (Internal Revenue Code)”
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of ChurchAltered precedent
- Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Jacobson
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Phipps
- National Carbide Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wodehouse
Cases on the same legal provision: Internal Revenue Code
- Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.
- United States v. Benedict
- United States v. Sanchez
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
- Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Lilly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Same Term, same area (Federal Taxation)
- Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of ChurchAltered precedent
- Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Jacobson
- Goggin v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement of California
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Phipps
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error