CaseTrail

Whitley v. Albers

475 U.S. 312 · Decided March 4, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Whitley v. Albers was decided on March 4, 1986 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Cruel and unusual punishment, non-death penalty” in the Criminal Procedure area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
475 U.S. 312 · 106 S. Ct. 1078 · 89 L. Ed. 2d 251 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 28
Docket number
84-1077
Decided
March 4, 1986
Argued
December 10, 1985
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
Warren E. Burger
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Whitley, Individually and as Assistant Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, et al. v. Albers

SCDB identifiers: case 1985-047, docket 1985-047-01.

Other cases on “Cruel and unusual punishment, non-death penalty”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error