Wayne Estelle v. Mark Owen McGuire
502 U.S. 62 · Decided December 4, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Wayne Estelle v. Mark Owen McGuire was decided on December 4, 1991 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Extra-legal jury influences, jury instructions” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 502 U.S. 62 · 112 S. Ct. 475 · 116 L. Ed. 2d 385 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 7060
- Docket number
- 90-1074
- Decided
- December 4, 1991
- Argued
- October 9, 1991
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Extra-legal jury influences, jury instructions
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority |
Did not participate: Clarence Thomas.
Full case caption
Wayne Estelle, Warden v. Mark Owen McGuire
SCDB identifiers: case 1991-007, docket 1991-007-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Extra-legal jury influences, jury instructions”
- Dale Robert Yates v. Parker Evatt
- Tommy Cage v. Louisiana
- John Sullivan v. Louisiana
- Clarence Victor v. Nebraska
- Carella v. California
- Jonathan Dale Simmons v. South Carolina
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Edward Harold Schad, Jr. v. Arizona
- Terry Foucha v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Quill Corporation v. North Dakota by and Through Its Tax CommissionerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Connecticut and John F. Digiovanni v. Brian K. DoehrLaw held unconstitutional
- Derrick Morgan v. Illinois
- Bryan Stuart Lankford v. Idaho
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- United States v. Alejandro Garcia Ibarra
- Guy Wooddell, Jr. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
- In re James Blodgett
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Joseph Patrick Doherty
- Randall D. White v. Illinois
- Keith J. Hudson v. Jack McMillian
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error