CaseTrail

Wachovia Bank v. Daniel G. Schmidt

546 U.S. 303 · Decided January 17, 2006 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Wachovia Bank v. Daniel G. Schmidt was decided on January 17, 2006 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
546 U.S. 303 · 126 S. Ct. 941 · 163 L. Ed. 2d 797 · 2006 U.S. LEXIS 766
Docket number
04-1186
Decided
January 17, 2006
Argued
November 28, 2005
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 1348
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Clarence Thomas.

Full case caption

Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Daniel G. Schmidt, III, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2005-019, docket 2005-019-01.

Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts”

See all

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error