Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co.
386 U.S. 685 · Decided April 24, 1967 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co. was decided on April 24, 1967 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 386 U.S. 685 · 87 S. Ct. 1326 · 18 L. Ed. 2d 406 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2982
- Docket number
- 18
- Decided
- April 24, 1967
- Argued
- January 17, 1967
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority |
Did not participate: Earl Warren.
Full case caption
Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1966-083, docket 1966-083-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Jantzen, Inc.
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. United States
- United States v. Sealy, Inc.
- United States v. Arnold
- Burke v. Ford
- Case-Swayne Co., Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.
- United States v. Pabst Brewing Co.
- United States v. Von's Grocery Co.
- United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
- United States v. Continental Can Co.
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Bank of Marin v. England
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.
- United States v. Demko
- Watkins v. Conway
- Walker v. Southern Railway Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error