United States v. New Jersey State Lottery Commission
420 U.S. 371 · Decided February 25, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
United States v. New Jersey State Lottery Commission was decided on February 25, 1975 by a vote of 7–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mootness” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 420 U.S. 371 · 95 S. Ct. 941 · 43 L. Ed. 2d 260 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 39
- Docket number
- 73-1471
- Decided
- February 25, 1975
- Argued
- November 20, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mootness
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Did not participate: Warren E. Burger.
Full case caption
United States et al. v. New Jersey State Lottery Commission
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-054, docket 1974-054-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mootness”
- Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
- Edwards v. Healy
- Preiser v. Newkirk
- Weinstein v. Bradford
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle
- Patterson v. Warner
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Vermont v. New York
- Defunis v. Odegaard
- Steffel v. Thompson
- O'Shea v. Littleton
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
- New Hampshire v. Maine
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- United States v. Michigan National Corp.
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union
- Fusari v. Steinberg
- Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore
- Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
- Lee v. Thornton
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error