United States v. Morrison
449 U.S. 361 · Decided January 13, 1981 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Morrison was decided on January 13, 1981 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 449 U.S. 361 · 101 S. Ct. 665 · 66 L. Ed. 2d 564 · 1981 U.S. LEXIS 54
- Docket number
- 79-395
- Decided
- January 13, 1981
- Argued
- December 10, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Right to counsel
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Morrison
SCDB identifiers: case 1980-022, docket 1980-022-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Right to counsel”
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County
- United States v. Henry
- Cuyler v. Sullivan
- Baldasar v. Illinois
- Wainwright v. Torna
- Scott v. Illinois
Cases on the same legal provision: Sixth Amendment (right to counsel)
- Holloway v. Arkansas
- Moore v. Illinois
- Strickland v. Washington
- Pennsylvania v. Finley
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
- United States v. Ash
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Colorado v. Bannister
- United States v. Difrancesco
- Watkins v. Sowders
- Mariscal v. United States
- United States v. Cortez
- Rubin v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error