United States v. McNinch
356 U.S. 595 · Decided May 26, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. McNinch was decided on May 26, 1958 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miscellaneous economic regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 356 U.S. 595 · 78 S. Ct. 950 · 2 L. Ed. 2d 1001 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1760
- Docket number
- 146
- Decided
- May 26, 1958
- Argued
- April 1, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Miscellaneous economic regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- False Claims Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. McNinch, Doing Business as Home Comfort Co., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1957-103, docket 1957-103-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Miscellaneous economic regulation”
- Rainwater v. United States
- Federal Housing Administration v. the Darlington, Inc.
- O'Neill v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc.
- County Board of Arlington County v. State Milk Commission.
- Zuber v. Allen
Cases on the same legal provision: False Claims Act
- Hughes Aircraft Company v. United States
- Cook County v. United States ex Rel. Janet Chandler
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States ex Rel. Karen T. Wilson
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United States
- Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. United States ex Rel. Karen T. Wilson
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gibson v. Thompson
- Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc.
- Black v. Magnolia Liquor Co., Inc.
- Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United States
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error