United States v. Frady
456 U.S. 152 · Decided April 5, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Frady was decided on April 5, 1982 by a vote of 6–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Habeas corpus” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 456 U.S. 152 · 102 S. Ct. 1584 · 71 L. Ed. 2d 816 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 95
- Docket number
- 80-1595
- Decided
- April 5, 1982
- Argued
- December 8, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–1
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- Byron R. White
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Habeas corpus
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Thurgood Marshall, Warren E. Burger.
Full case caption
United States v. Frady
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-077, docket 1981-077-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Habeas corpus”
- Engle v. Isaac
- Sumner v. Mata
- Rose v. Lundy
- Lehman on Behalf of Her Children v. Lycoming County Children's Services Agency
- Harris v. Rivera
- Duckworth v. Serrano
Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241–2255 (habeas corpus)
- Barefoot v. Estelle
- Antone v. Dugger
- Cuyler v. Sullivan
- Wainwright v. Witt
- Vasquez v. Hillery
- Kimmelman v. Morrison
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Duckworth v. Serrano
- Harris v. Rivera
- Boag v. Macdougall
- Hutto v. Davis
- Washington v. Chrisman
- Eddings v. Oklahoma
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error