United States v. Brown
381 U.S. 437 · Decided June 7, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
United States v. Brown was decided on June 7, 1965 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Internal security legislation” in the First Amendment area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 381 U.S. 437 · 85 S. Ct. 1707 · 14 L. Ed. 2d 484 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2206
- Docket number
- 399
- Decided
- June 7, 1965
- Argued
- March 29, 1965
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Earl Warren
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Internal security legislation
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Held unconstitutional
- An act of Congress
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Brown
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-120, docket 1964-120-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Internal security legislation”
- Zemel v. Rusk
- American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born v. Subversive Activities Control Board
- Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- Aptheker v. Secretary of StateLaw held unconstitutional
- Dennis v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act
- Calhoon v. Harvey
- American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada v. Wittstein
- Wirtz v. Local 153
- Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125
- Wirtz v. Hotel
- International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Hardeman
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Garrison v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Cox v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
- Cox v. Louisiana
- Freedman v. MarylandLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Seeger
- Henry v. Collins
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error