United States v. Augenblick
393 U.S. 348 · Decided January 14, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Augenblick was decided on January 14, 1969 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Military, active duty” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 348 · 89 S. Ct. 528 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 537 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2855
- Docket number
- 45
- Decided
- January 14, 1969
- Argued
- November 21, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Military, active duty
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Evidence
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Augenblick et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-031, docket 1968-031-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Military, active duty”
- O'Callahan v. ParkerLaw held unconstitutional
- Relford v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Ft. Leavenworth
- California v. Buzard
- Snapp v. Neal
- Cass v. United States
- Parker v. Levy
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Evidence
- Hawkins v. United States
- United States v. Gillock
- Pereira v. United States
- Luce v. United States
- United States v. Abel
- Tanner v. United States
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Williams v. RhodesLaw held unconstitutional
- Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11
- Gardner v. California
- Hunter v. EricksonLaw held unconstitutional
- Alabama State Teachers Assn. v. Alabama Public School and College Authority
- Johnson v. Avery
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error