U.S. v. Executive Health Resources
599 U.S. 419 · Decided June 16, 2023 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
U.S. v. Executive Health Resources was decided on June 16, 2023 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Consumer protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 599 U.S. 419 · 143 S. Ct. 1720 · 216 L. Ed. 2d 370 · 2023 U.S. LEXIS 2547
- Docket number
- 21-1052
- Decided
- June 16, 2023
- Argued
- December 6, 2022
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Consumer protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- False Claims Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Concurrence | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Majority |
Full case caption
U.S., ex Rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources
SCDB identifiers: case 2022-021, docket 2022-021-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Consumer protection”
- United States ex Rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.
- Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz
- Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger
- FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC
- Amg Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
- Rotkiske v. Klemm
Cases on the same legal provision: False Claims Act
- Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. U.S.
- Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar
- Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. United States ex Rel. Karen T. Wilson
- Allison Engine Company, Inc. v. United States ex Rel. Roger L. Sanders and Roger L. Thacker
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United States
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States ex Rel. Karen T. Wilson
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
- Wilkins v. United States
- Moac Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
- National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
- Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith
- Gonzalez v. Google LLC
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error