CaseTrail

Tralins v. Gerstein

378 U.S. 576 · Decided June 22, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Tralins v. Gerstein was decided on June 22, 1964 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Obscenity, state” in the First Amendment area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
378 U.S. 576 · 84 S. Ct. 1903 · 12 L. Ed. 2d 1033 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 863
Docket number
246
Decided
June 22, 1964
Court era
Warren Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Opinion assigned by
Hugo L. Black
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Obscenity, state
Issue area
First Amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackSpecial concurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice William O. DouglasSpecial concurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice Tom C. ClarkJurisdictional dissent
Chief Justice Earl WarrenJurisdictional dissent
Justice John M. Harlan IIJurisdictional dissent
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Special concurrenceCo-authored an opinion
Justice Potter StewartSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Byron R. WhiteJurisdictional dissent
Justice Arthur J. GoldbergSpecial concurrenceCo-authored an opinion

Full case caption

Tralins v. Gerstein, State Attorney

SCDB identifiers: case 1963-175, docket 1963-175-01.

Other cases on “Obscenity, state”

See all

Same Term, same area (First Amendment)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error